Concordo, dava pra fazer algo mais elaborado...Rodolfo escreveu:Não gosto dessa tela enorme no interior, acho meio exagerado e fora de design.
Ficaria melhor terem 2 em ângulos diferentes e mais integradas ao design.
Tesla talk
Moderador:Moderadores
- Kicksilver
- Moderador
- Mensagens:79925
- Registrado em:02 Jul 2011, 01:00
- Localização:Rio de Janeiro
- Ramiel
- Administrador
- Mensagens:27720
- Registrado em:15 Jul 2011, 01:00
Negão tá mendigando o carro? 
Quanto a tela, o objetivo dela é esse mesmo, fazer todo mundo comentar
Quanto a tela, o objetivo dela é esse mesmo, fazer todo mundo comentar
- Rodolfo
- Administrador
- Mensagens:21435
- Registrado em:02 Jul 2011, 01:00
Bela lógica...
Só que não.
Seria melhor fazer um negócio bem feito, pra comentarem sobre como foi bem feita e bem pensada. Não?!
-- Adicionado em 20131124T20:38:23-04:00 --
*Deus criando uma gostosa*
"Po, essa mulher ficou perfeita!!!!! Mas vou meter um pinto no meio do rosto dela pra todo mundo comentar... "

Só que não.
Seria melhor fazer um negócio bem feito, pra comentarem sobre como foi bem feita e bem pensada. Não?!
-- Adicionado em 20131124T20:38:23-04:00 --
*Deus criando uma gostosa*
"Po, essa mulher ficou perfeita!!!!! Mas vou meter um pinto no meio do rosto dela pra todo mundo comentar... "

Bravo Essence Dualogic 1.8 2013/13

- Ramiel
- Administrador
- Mensagens:27720
- Registrado em:15 Jul 2011, 01:00
Duas telas menores de 8.5" não dão o mesmo impacto de uma de 17"
- Vittel
- Trolls Premiuns
- Mensagens:48195
- Registrado em:29 Jul 2011, 01:00
- Localização:Rio de Janeiro
E tem lag 
Enviado de meu Nexus 4 usando Tapatalk

Enviado de meu Nexus 4 usando Tapatalk

- Kicksilver
- Moderador
- Mensagens:79925
- Registrado em:02 Jul 2011, 01:00
- Localização:Rio de Janeiro
Roda droid? 

- jpaulo
- Trolls Premiuns
- Mensagens:3369
- Registrado em:03 Jul 2011, 01:00
É Tuti 


"Liebe den wagen, der du fährst."
- Rodolfo
- Administrador
- Mensagens:21435
- Registrado em:02 Jul 2011, 01:00
Resistiva??
Bravo Essence Dualogic 1.8 2013/13

- Vittel
- Trolls Premiuns
- Mensagens:48195
- Registrado em:29 Jul 2011, 01:00
- Localização:Rio de Janeiro
Ah, touch 
Enviado de meu Nexus 4 usando Tapatalk

Enviado de meu Nexus 4 usando Tapatalk

- Kicksilver
- Moderador
- Mensagens:79925
- Registrado em:02 Jul 2011, 01:00
- Localização:Rio de Janeiro
Em breve, voice commands 

- Ramiel
- Administrador
- Mensagens:27720
- Registrado em:15 Jul 2011, 01:00
California grants Tesla $34.7 million tax break to boost production

Tesla Motors' plans to expand just got a big boost, as the state of California has announced it will give the Palo Alto-based company a $34.7 million tax break to increase its production capacity. The EV manufacturer is being given a pass on sales and use taxes on up to $415 million worth of equipment, according to a report on the San Francisco Chronicle's website.
Tesla is currently on track to produce 21,500 cars, although the planned expansion should more than double that capacity to 56,500 units, adding 112 jobs at Tesla's Fremont factory. "I'm pleased we could take this action to encourage Tesla to expand its electric vehicle production in California, which will create green jobs and improve our air quality," State Treasurer Bill Lockyer said. The state estimates that between the additional jobs and (hoped for) increase in sales, it will recoup the costs of the tax break in more taxes.
http://www.autoblog.com/2013/12/18/cali ... roduction/
Tradução: A Tesla acaba de receber do governo da Califórnia um incentivo em arrecadação de impostos no valor de 34,7 milhões de dólares para que ela possa dobrar a produção de seus veículos. Também recebeu um incentivo de 415 milhões em equipamentos.

Tesla Motors' plans to expand just got a big boost, as the state of California has announced it will give the Palo Alto-based company a $34.7 million tax break to increase its production capacity. The EV manufacturer is being given a pass on sales and use taxes on up to $415 million worth of equipment, according to a report on the San Francisco Chronicle's website.
Tesla is currently on track to produce 21,500 cars, although the planned expansion should more than double that capacity to 56,500 units, adding 112 jobs at Tesla's Fremont factory. "I'm pleased we could take this action to encourage Tesla to expand its electric vehicle production in California, which will create green jobs and improve our air quality," State Treasurer Bill Lockyer said. The state estimates that between the additional jobs and (hoped for) increase in sales, it will recoup the costs of the tax break in more taxes.
http://www.autoblog.com/2013/12/18/cali ... roduction/
Tradução: A Tesla acaba de receber do governo da Califórnia um incentivo em arrecadação de impostos no valor de 34,7 milhões de dólares para que ela possa dobrar a produção de seus veículos. Também recebeu um incentivo de 415 milhões em equipamentos.
- Elvis
- Administrador
- Mensagens:6225
- Registrado em:22 Set 2011, 01:00
- Localização:Brasil
- Contato:
Tesla


- Vittel
- Trolls Premiuns
- Mensagens:48195
- Registrado em:29 Jul 2011, 01:00
- Localização:Rio de Janeiro
Falando em Tesla, o Model S deu pau no Camaro ZL1 no Top Gear 
Torque máximo @0rpm
Enviado de meu Nexus 4 usando Tapatalk

Torque máximo @0rpm

Enviado de meu Nexus 4 usando Tapatalk

- Ramiel
- Administrador
- Mensagens:27720
- Registrado em:15 Jul 2011, 01:00
Fire Dept. Says Tesla Charger May Have Caused Fire, Tesla Says Nope

A Southern California fire department says that a Tesla Model S charging system may have been a possible cause of a Nov. 15 fire at a garage, but Tesla officials this evening denied that the car or its charger had anything to do with the blaze.
Reuters released an exclusive report on a fire last month in the garage of a single-family home in Irvine. While the Orange County Fire Authority "emphasizes that the cause of the fire is unclear," they said a Tesla 240-volt charging system may have been to blame. From the story: P
"The most probable cause of this fire is a high resistance connection at the wall socket or the Universal Mobile Connector from the Tesla charging system" which was plugged into a 240-volt wall socket, the report said.P
No injuries occurred as a result of the fire. The story says the spread of the flames was aided by cardboard boxes stacked near the car and the charger.
But officials from Tesla say they have conducted their own investigation, the results of which they say shows the fire was not in any way related to the car, its battery or the charge electronics.
There was a fire at the wall socket where the Model S was plugged in, but the car itself was not part of the fire. The cable was fine on the vehicle side; the damage was on the wall side. Our inspection of the car and the battery made clear that neither were the source and were in fact functioning normally after the incident. In addition, a review of the car's logs showed that the battery had been charging normally, and there were no fluctuations in temperature or malfunctions within the battery or the charge electronics.
Tesla also took a shot at Reuters, calling their story misleading and again stressing that electrons are less flammable than gasoline:
All of the above information was provided to the journalists and editors at Reuters responsible for the article. It is therefore disappointing that they would choose to publish as "news" a misleading article about an event that occurred more than a month ago that was not caused by the car and that was already covered by the Orange County Register. It appears that their objective was simply to find some way to put the words "fire" and "Tesla" in the same headline. The journalists and editors who created the story have patently ignored hundreds of deaths and thousands of serious injuries unequivocally caused by gasoline car fires, instead choosing to write about a garage fire where there were no injuries and the cause was clearly not the car.
More details on this as we get it.
http://jalopnik.com/fire-dept-says-tesl ... 1486239680
Tradução: Dia 15 Novembro houve um incêndio no sul da Califórnia envolvendo um Tesla Model S que estava conectado numa tomada de 240v para recarregar. A Tesla afirmou q o incêndio aconteceu na parede e não no carro.

A Southern California fire department says that a Tesla Model S charging system may have been a possible cause of a Nov. 15 fire at a garage, but Tesla officials this evening denied that the car or its charger had anything to do with the blaze.
Reuters released an exclusive report on a fire last month in the garage of a single-family home in Irvine. While the Orange County Fire Authority "emphasizes that the cause of the fire is unclear," they said a Tesla 240-volt charging system may have been to blame. From the story: P
"The most probable cause of this fire is a high resistance connection at the wall socket or the Universal Mobile Connector from the Tesla charging system" which was plugged into a 240-volt wall socket, the report said.P
No injuries occurred as a result of the fire. The story says the spread of the flames was aided by cardboard boxes stacked near the car and the charger.
But officials from Tesla say they have conducted their own investigation, the results of which they say shows the fire was not in any way related to the car, its battery or the charge electronics.
There was a fire at the wall socket where the Model S was plugged in, but the car itself was not part of the fire. The cable was fine on the vehicle side; the damage was on the wall side. Our inspection of the car and the battery made clear that neither were the source and were in fact functioning normally after the incident. In addition, a review of the car's logs showed that the battery had been charging normally, and there were no fluctuations in temperature or malfunctions within the battery or the charge electronics.
Tesla also took a shot at Reuters, calling their story misleading and again stressing that electrons are less flammable than gasoline:
All of the above information was provided to the journalists and editors at Reuters responsible for the article. It is therefore disappointing that they would choose to publish as "news" a misleading article about an event that occurred more than a month ago that was not caused by the car and that was already covered by the Orange County Register. It appears that their objective was simply to find some way to put the words "fire" and "Tesla" in the same headline. The journalists and editors who created the story have patently ignored hundreds of deaths and thousands of serious injuries unequivocally caused by gasoline car fires, instead choosing to write about a garage fire where there were no injuries and the cause was clearly not the car.
More details on this as we get it.
http://jalopnik.com/fire-dept-says-tesl ... 1486239680
Tradução: Dia 15 Novembro houve um incêndio no sul da Califórnia envolvendo um Tesla Model S que estava conectado numa tomada de 240v para recarregar. A Tesla afirmou q o incêndio aconteceu na parede e não no carro.
- Vittel
- Trolls Premiuns
- Mensagens:48195
- Registrado em:29 Jul 2011, 01:00
- Localização:Rio de Janeiro

Enviado de meu Nexus 4 usando Tapatalk

- Ramiel
- Administrador
- Mensagens:27720
- Registrado em:15 Jul 2011, 01:00
Isso na revista ou no programa de TV?Vittel escreveu:Falando em Tesla, o Model S deu pau no Camaro ZL1 no Top Gear
Torque máximo @0rpm
Enviado de meu Nexus 4 usando Tapatalk
Estão tentando pegar a Tesla no contra-pé de qualquer jeitoVittel escreveu:
Enviado de meu Nexus 4 usando Tapatalk

- Vittel
- Trolls Premiuns
- Mensagens:48195
- Registrado em:29 Jul 2011, 01:00
- Localização:Rio de Janeiro
Na o TG USA.Ramiel escreveu:Isso na revista ou no programa de TV?Vittel escreveu:Falando em Tesla, o Model S deu pau no Camaro ZL1 no Top Gear
Torque máximo @0rpm
Enviado de meu Nexus 4 usando Tapatalk
Estão tentando pegar a Tesla no contra-pé de qualquer jeitoVittel escreveu:
Enviado de meu Nexus 4 usando Tapatalk
O Leaf deu 47mph andando de ré.

Enviado de meu Nexus 4 usando Tapatalk

- Vittel
- Trolls Premiuns
- Mensagens:48195
- Registrado em:29 Jul 2011, 01:00
- Localização:Rio de Janeiro
Foi recente, 4° temporada, episódio 7.
Pegaram 500 EV, Focus EV e Leaf.
Aí no final quem ganhasse testava o Model S.
Peguei no final gear o torrent, não achei nenhum vídeo solto por aí.
Enviado de meu Nexus 4 usando Tapatalk
Pegaram 500 EV, Focus EV e Leaf.
Aí no final quem ganhasse testava o Model S.

Peguei no final gear o torrent, não achei nenhum vídeo solto por aí.
Enviado de meu Nexus 4 usando Tapatalk

- Kicksilver
- Moderador
- Mensagens:79925
- Registrado em:02 Jul 2011, 01:00
- Localização:Rio de Janeiro
Motor elétrico 
via Tapatalk

via Tapatalk- Ramiel
- Administrador
- Mensagens:27720
- Registrado em:15 Jul 2011, 01:00
Tesla updates Model S software as a precaution against unsafe charging

Tesla Motors has maintained that the most recent fire involving one of its Model S electric vehicles isn't the result of a vehicle or battery malfunction, but the company is still addressing the situation with a software fix, according to Green Car Reports. The California-based automaker has added a software function that automatically reduces the charge current by about 25 percent when power from the charging source fluctuates outside of a certain range, Green Car Reports says, citing the Twitter feed from an Apple employee, @ddenboer, who owns a Model S. You can read the text of the update below.
Last month's fire in an Irvine, CA, garage was the fourth involving a Tesla this year. The company cited an investigation by the Orange County Fire Authority and said the incident was caused by a wall-charging system that overheated and not by the luxury sedan itself. Meanwhile, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) continues to take a closer look at the other three Tesla fires, all of which took place during the fall. Two of the fires - one in Tennessee and another near Seattle - were caused by metal debris in the road that struck the bottom of car and hit the car's battery with such great force that the battery was punctured.
http://green.autoblog.com/2013/12/26/te ... -charging/
Tradução: O último caso de fogo envolvendo um Tesla Model S aconteceu mês passado em Irvine, Califórnia, onde o departamente de bombeiros de Orange County chegou a conclusão de que o fogo foi causado pelo sistema de carregamento de parede que sobreaqueceu e não pelo carro em si. Mesmo assim, a Tesla está fazendo uma atualização de software nos seus Model S para que o mesmo diminua a taxa de recarga para 25% quando o mesmo perceber que a corrente do carregador está variando demais, tentando evitar uma sobrecarga no recarregador e possíveis incêndios.

Tesla Motors has maintained that the most recent fire involving one of its Model S electric vehicles isn't the result of a vehicle or battery malfunction, but the company is still addressing the situation with a software fix, according to Green Car Reports. The California-based automaker has added a software function that automatically reduces the charge current by about 25 percent when power from the charging source fluctuates outside of a certain range, Green Car Reports says, citing the Twitter feed from an Apple employee, @ddenboer, who owns a Model S. You can read the text of the update below.
Last month's fire in an Irvine, CA, garage was the fourth involving a Tesla this year. The company cited an investigation by the Orange County Fire Authority and said the incident was caused by a wall-charging system that overheated and not by the luxury sedan itself. Meanwhile, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) continues to take a closer look at the other three Tesla fires, all of which took place during the fall. Two of the fires - one in Tennessee and another near Seattle - were caused by metal debris in the road that struck the bottom of car and hit the car's battery with such great force that the battery was punctured.
http://green.autoblog.com/2013/12/26/te ... -charging/
Tradução: O último caso de fogo envolvendo um Tesla Model S aconteceu mês passado em Irvine, Califórnia, onde o departamente de bombeiros de Orange County chegou a conclusão de que o fogo foi causado pelo sistema de carregamento de parede que sobreaqueceu e não pelo carro em si. Mesmo assim, a Tesla está fazendo uma atualização de software nos seus Model S para que o mesmo diminua a taxa de recarga para 25% quando o mesmo perceber que a corrente do carregador está variando demais, tentando evitar uma sobrecarga no recarregador e possíveis incêndios.
- Vittel
- Trolls Premiuns
- Mensagens:48195
- Registrado em:29 Jul 2011, 01:00
- Localização:Rio de Janeiro
Bugs 
Enviado de meu Nexus 4 usando Tapatalk

Enviado de meu Nexus 4 usando Tapatalk

- Kicksilver
- Moderador
- Mensagens:79925
- Registrado em:02 Jul 2011, 01:00
- Localização:Rio de Janeiro
Updates 

- Ramiel
- Administrador
- Mensagens:27720
- Registrado em:15 Jul 2011, 01:00
Isso não foi um bugVittel escreveu:Bugs
Enviado de meu Nexus 4 usando Tapatalk

